Although the Design-Build type of construction contracting is considered an extremely recent development, it is actually a more traditional way of doing things than the more commonly used Design-Bid-Build model. Design-Build was used for thousands of years prior to the second half of the Nineteenth Century, when Design-Bid-Build begun to function as the standard way of contracting for construction projects. The difference between the two models is that under Design-Bid-Build, the designer, architect or electrical engineer is shortened independently of the builder. Under the Design-Build model, the architect is an employee or subcontractor of the firm that is shortened to build a project.
Design-Build is gaining popularity among organizations that require commercial and production facilities built because they find that it reduces their own admin and legal costs and headaches. The design Contractor near me of a facility is incorporated into one contract instead of two. This means that a corporation needs to find only one organization to develop and build a project. Some studies have shown that a Design-Build process can significantly reduce the time it takes to complete a project and the overall cost. This might be because designers and contractors work collaboratively instead of being adversaries. The builder can save time by getting many of the basic processes of a project underway while the architect is designing the project. The architect or designer of a project has the benefit of knowledge of a contractor’s past projects. The architect knows about the contractor’s relationships with vendors of materials and subcontractors. The contractor and the designer can team up to create a construction project cost effective for their client.
Organizations that are considering contracting a commercial or industrial facility built may want to weigh the cost and time benefits of a Design-Build contract against possible drawbacks. There were reasons that the Design-Bid-Build system happened. If architects and contractors are hired separately from each other, they can provide a system of checks and balances to keep each other honest and grounded in reality. A designer working independently of a contractor makes it more difficult for a contractor to build projects that are not up to building codes or that use second-rate materials. Contractors that do not have an in-house designer or architect may be able to make a client aware of several architects or designers when presenting a collection of past projects. This may help the builder prevent losing a contract if the client does not like the designs of some of the builder’s past projects. Contractors that use a Design-Build may lose some contracts simply because potential clients don’t especially like the appearance of the architect’s past projects. A good contractor should be able to tell litigant that wish design looks impressive, it does not imply that it is practicable. However, an in-house architect may have his or her creativity stifled for the health of cost benefits.